From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wenhold v. Marsh

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Sep 6, 2022
4:22-CV-00105 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2022)

Opinion

4:22-CV-00105

09-06-2022

JORDAN DEAN WENHOLD, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROBERT MARSH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MATTHEW W. BRANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 6th day of September 2022, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' unopposed motion (Doc. 17) for partial dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against defendant Dr. Robert Marsh and his Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claims against defendants Lt. J. Stavola and Marsh are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's state-law negligence claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by state statutory sovereign immunity.
2. No further leave to amend shall be granted as amendment would be futile and because Plaintiff has failed to cure the deficiencies with previous amendments allowed. See Grayson v. Mayview State Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 114 (3d Cir. 2002).
3. This case shall proceed on Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim against defendant Unit Manager Abbey Nelson for alleged failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate defendants Stavola and Marsh.
5. Defendant Nelson shall file an appropriate responsive pleading pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Wenhold v. Marsh

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Sep 6, 2022
4:22-CV-00105 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Wenhold v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:JORDAN DEAN WENHOLD, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROBERT MARSH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

4:22-CV-00105 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 6, 2022)