From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wemple v. Cadoret

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 29, 1968
29 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 29, 1968


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. Appeal by the defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term entered in Fulton County as granted the plaintiffs 30 days within which to serve a complaint and upon compliance excused the default of the plaintiffs in timely serving their complaint (CPLR 3012, subd. [b]). The record shows that more than a year had elapsed from the time when the plaintiffs were required to serve their complaint. The plaintiffs also failed to appear and/or submit a proposed complaint or any excuse for their default upon the return date of the motion. Under such circumstances, the motion should have been granted. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by striking so much of the second decretal paragraph as grants a 30-day extension of time to the plaintiffs and by directing that the action be dismissed for failure to serve a complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.


Summaries of

Wemple v. Cadoret

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 29, 1968
29 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Wemple v. Cadoret

Case Details

Full title:GARTH WEMPLE et al., Respondents, v. FRANKLIN CADORET, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 1033 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Lavigne v. Allen

I dissent and vote to reverse. It is my feeling that the motion to dismiss under CPLR 3012 (subd. [b])…

Johnson v. Glens Falls Hospital

failures are generally unacceptable excuses for prolonged delays on motions to dismiss for want of…