From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 8, 1999
25 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED75295 ED75275

FILED: June 8, 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Honorable John W. Grimm.

Nancy L. Vincent; District Defender, Office B; Office of the State Public Defender; 1221 Locust, Suite 350; St. Louis, MO 63103, Attorney for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General, Cheryl Caponegro Nield; Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899; Jefferson City, MO 65102, Attorneys for respondent.

Before Hoff, P.J. and Gaertner, J. and Russell, J.



ORDER


Keith Wells (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wells v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 8, 1999
25 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Wells v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEITH WELLS, MOVANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jun 8, 1999

Citations

25 S.W.3d 480 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)