From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 22, 2005
899 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 5D05-1011.

April 22, 2005.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Christopher Wells, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.


Christopher Wells petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus to file a belated motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He alleges that after he was convicted and sentenced in 1975, he hired an attorney to timely file such a motion, but it was never filed. We deny the petition without prejudice for Wells to petition the trial court, the proper forum, for a writ of habeas corpus. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla. 1999). Upon receiving the petition, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether trial counsel undertook to file a 3.850 motion, but failed to do so in a timely manner. If Wells prevails at the hearing, he may then file a belated 3.850 motion. Steele at 934.

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 22, 2005
899 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Wells v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher WELLS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 22, 2005

Citations

899 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)