From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 9, 1998
718 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-03118

October 9, 1998.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Bob Anderson Mitcham, Judge.


Lee Ollie Wells appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence and/or motion to withdraw plea. Because Wells' motion was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the trial court did not address the issues Wells raised that were not within the narrow scope of that rule. We affirm without prejudice for Wells to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Lee Ollie Wells pleaded guilty to several charges in July 1997 and received sentences, apparently in accordance with a negotiated plea. In January 1998, he filed a handwritten motion that expressly requested relief under rule 3.800(a). The motion was not sufficient for treatment as a motion pursuant to rule 3.850. When the trial court properly denied the motion in May 1998, it explained to Wells that he could file a motion pursuant to rule 3.850. Wells has had ample time to follow the trial court's advice, and still has more than six months in which to decide whether he can allege facts under oath that would allow him to withdraw his plea.

Affirmed.

PARKER, C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 9, 1998
718 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Wells v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEE OLLIE WELLS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 9, 1998

Citations

718 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)