From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Pressley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2018
159 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6145 [M–6508] Ind. 6548/06 41/07 O.P. 134/17

03-29-2018

In re Carl D. WELLS, Petitioner, v. Warden Ada PRESSLEY, et al., Respondents.

Carl D. Wells, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Hon. Kevin McGrath, respondent. District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.


Carl D. Wells, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Hon. Kevin McGrath, respondent.

District Attorney, New York (John T. Hughes of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Singh, JJ.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.


Summaries of

Wells v. Pressley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2018
159 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Wells v. Pressley

Case Details

Full title:In re Carl D. Wells, Petitioner, v. Warden Ada Pressley, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 29, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 2263
70 N.Y.S.3d 828