From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 8, 2017
2017-1298 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1298

12-08-2017

ELAINE WELLS, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

MICHAEL D. J. EISENBERG, Law Office of Michael D. J. Eisenberg, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. SARA B. REARDEN, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK, KATHERINE M. SMITH, JEFFREY A. GAUGER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT-0752-16-0206-I-1.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL D. J. EISENBERG, Law Office of Michael D. J. Eisenberg, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. SARA B. REARDEN, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK, KATHERINE M. SMITH, JEFFREY A. GAUGER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 8, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Wells v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 8, 2017
2017-1298 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Wells v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE WELLS, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 2017

Citations

2017-1298 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2017)