Opinion
2:21-cv-01346-JCM-EJY
04-27-2023
MARCIA WELLS and TEENA ACREE, individually and as Co-Special Administrators of the Estate of Byron Lee Williams, Deceased; TINA LEWIS-STEVENSON, individually as an heir; GWENDOLYN LEWIS, individually as an heir; ROBYN WILLIAMS, individually as an heir and DEWAIN LEWIS, individually as an heir, Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; OFFICER PATRICK CAMPBELL, individually and as an agent of the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; OFFICER BENJAMIN VASQUEZ, individually and as an agent of the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; OFFICER ALEXANDER GONZALEZ, individually and as an agent of the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; OFFICER ROCKY ROMAN, individually and as an agent of the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department; and SHERIFF JOE LOMBARDO, as agent of the City of Las Vegas, Clark County, and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Defendants.
Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Campbell, Vasquez, Gonzalez, Roman and Lombardo Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Campbell, Vasquez, Gonzalez, Roman and Lombardo ROMANUCCI & BLANDIN, LLC Javier Rodriguez, Jr., Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Attorney for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Campbell, Vasquez, Gonzalez, Roman and Lombardo Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Campbell, Vasquez, Gonzalez, Roman and Lombardo
ROMANUCCI & BLANDIN, LLC Javier Rodriguez, Jr., Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Attorney for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR: 1. PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 58); 2. PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE (ECF NO. 59); 3. DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE (ECF NO. 62, 63, AND 64) (FIRST REQUEST):
The Parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following:
1. On April 21, 2023, the Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 58). The current deadline for the Plaintiffs to respond to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is May 12, 2023.
2. On April 21, 2023, the Defendants filed a Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Zelda Okia, M.D. (ECF No. 59) The Plaintiffs' opposition is currently due on May 5, 2023.
3. On April 21, 2023, the Plaintiffs filed: (a) Motion in Limine to Exclude Dr. Gary Vilke's Testimony (ECF No. 62); (b) Motion in Limine to Exclude Jack Ryan's Testimony (ECF No. 63); and (3) Motion in Limine to Exclude Clarence Chapman's Testimony (ECF No. 64). The Defendants' oppositions are currently due May 5, 2023.
4. On April 24, 2023, the Parties met and conferred regarding the above-referenced motions and agreed that additional time is required to adequately respond the pending motions.
5. Good cause exists for this request. Plaintiffs' counsel is currently responding to a summary judgment motion, Daubert motions, and other motions in limine in unrelated cases. Those responsive pleadings are due in May 2023. Defense counsel is currently drafting two Ninth Circuit Court appellate briefs, a motion for summary judgment in an unrelated case, and responding to a motion for summary judgment in another case. All of these pleadings are also due in May 2023.
6. Due to these conflicts, both parties agree that Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion in Limine and the Defendants' responses to the Plaintiffs' motions in limine be extended to June 14, 2023.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is due June 14, 2023;
(2) Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Okia is due June 14, 2023;
(3) Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Dr. Gary Vilke's Testimony is due June 14, 2023;
(4) Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Jack Ryan's Testimony is due June 14, 2023; and
(5) Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Clarence Chapman's Testimony is due June 14, 2023.