From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Gen. Dynamics Info. Tech., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
May 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-18 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 1, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-18 (MTT)

05-01-2012

TAMMY WELLS, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 130) of the Court's Order instructing the Plaintiff to sign the medical authorizations provided by the Defendants (Doc. 129). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

After the entry of the Court's Order, the Plaintiff signed eleven of the medical releases, but refused to sign nine. The Plaintiff claims that six of the health care providers "provided medical care to the Plaintiff that is both related and unrelated, to matters involving the Defendants." (Doc. 130, Health Care Providers 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 16). The Plaintiff claims that three of the health care providers "provided no medical care to the Plaintiff that is in any way related to matters involving the Defendants." (Doc. 130, Health Care Providers 13, 15, and 17).

I. Health Care Providers 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 16

The Plaintiff claims that these six health care providers provided medical care to the Plaintiff that is both related and unrelated to the matters in this case. First, it is not unusual that a provider's records in a claim involving personal injury will contain some information not related to the Plaintiff's claimed injuries. That does not mean, however, that the records are not discoverable. Second, the Plaintiff proposes no way to determine which medical records are discoverable and medical records are not. Therefore, the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED with regard to these health care providers. The Plaintiff is again ORDERED to sign the medical authorizations for the following health care providers:

1. Dr. Ferial Walid
Primary Family Medicine
110 Woodcrest Blvd.
Warner Robins, GA 31093
4. Dr. Becky L. Campbell
Baggett and Campbell
500 Spillers Way
Warner Robins, GA 31088
6. Dr. Thomas H. Williamson
310-B Margie Drive
Warner Robins, GA 31088
8. Dr. Alan G. Struth
Internal Medicine and Rheumatology
1037 North Houston Road
Warner Robins, GA 31093
10. Dr. Peter O. Holliday, III
Coliseum Northside Hospital
420 Charter Blvd., Suite 402
Macon, GA 31210
16. Dr. Daniel Snow
15001 Dufief Mill Road
Gaithersburg, MD 20878

II. Health Care Providers 13, 15, and 17

The Plaintiff claims that these three health care providers administered no medical care to the Plaintiff related to this case.

A. Health Care Provider 13

The Plaintiff claims that Health Care Provider 13, the Nexus Pain Center of Houston's medical care is unrelated to this case. However, given the time frame of her care and the nature of the treatment, presumably pain treatment, the Nexus Pain Center of Houston records are discoverable. Therefore, the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED with regard to the medical records from Nexus Pain Center of Houston. The Plaintiff is again ORDERED to sign the medical authorization for the following health care provider:

13. Nexus Pain Center of Houston
100 Jim Mason Court
Warner Robins, GA 31088
B. Health Care Providers 15 and 17

The Plaintiff claims that Health Care Providers 15 and 17, Piedmont Colorectal Associates' and Dr. Julia C. Korenman's medical care are unrelated to this case. The Plaintiff does not explain to the Court why these medical records are not discoverable. However, both health care providers provide medical services related to gastroenterology and colon/rectal health. It is not apparent to the Court why medical records of this nature would be discoverable. The Defendants have set forth no reasons as to why medical records of this nature are discoverable. Therefore, the Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED with regard to the medical records from Piedmont Colorectal Associates and Dr. Julia C. Korenman.

The Defendants are welcome to advance specific reasons as to why the Plaintiff's medical records regarding gastroenterology and colon/rectal health are discoverable.

III. Conclusion

For the above reasons, the Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Doc. 130). The Plaintiff has until Friday, May 4, 2012, to sign and forward the medical authorizations for Health Care Providers 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, and 16 to the Defendants' Counsel at:

Halima Horton

1170 Peachtree Street, NE

Suite 2100

Atlanta, GA 30309.

____________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Wells v. Gen. Dynamics Info. Tech., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
May 1, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-18 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Wells v. Gen. Dynamics Info. Tech., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY WELLS, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-18 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 1, 2012)