From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. CDCR Emps.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 10, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-2625 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-2625 KJM CKD P

04-10-2020

JESSE C. WELLS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR EMPLOYEES, et al, Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed February 25, 2020, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ////// ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: April 10, 2020

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
barr0418.fta


Summaries of

Wells v. CDCR Emps.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 10, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-2625 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Wells v. CDCR Emps.

Case Details

Full title:JESSE C. WELLS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR EMPLOYEES, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 10, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-2625 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2020)