From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Bank of Am., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 14, 2015
Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-3658-M (N.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2015)

Summary

holding by analogous reasoning, in a distinct but related context, that "[t]here is no requirement that an abandonment of acceleration be in writing, however, and it is not subject to the statute of frauds since the parties can accomplish abandonment by their actions alone"

Summary of this case from Berry v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-3658-M

07-14-2015

GARY WELLS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed November 5, 2014 (doc. 24), is DENIED, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support, filed November 7, 2014 (doc. 27) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, Plaintiff's remaining claims will be DISMISSED with prejudice.

SIGNED this 14th day of July, 2015.

/s/_________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Wells v. Bank of Am., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 14, 2015
Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-3658-M (N.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2015)

holding by analogous reasoning, in a distinct but related context, that "[t]here is no requirement that an abandonment of acceleration be in writing, however, and it is not subject to the statute of frauds since the parties can accomplish abandonment by their actions alone"

Summary of this case from Berry v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n

concluding plaintiff's suit to quiet title "fails as a matter of law" after the court had determined that the mortgage lien was not invalid or unenforceable due to limitations

Summary of this case from Daniels v. Regions Bank
Case details for

Wells v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:GARY WELLS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-3658-M (N.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

Sexton v. Deutsche Bank, N.A.

"Abandonment of acceleration and waiver of acceleration are different issues." Wells v. Bank of Am., N.A.,…

New Hope Hospitality, LLC v. EH Nat'l Bank

28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202. It gives federal courts broad discretion to grant or refuse declaratory judgment.…