From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Ataner Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 30, 2024
21-cv-11032 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-11032

10-30-2024

APRIL WELLS, Plaintiff, v. ATANER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF NO. 124)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On September 26, 2024, the Court entered an order granting (1) Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 109) and (2) Defendant Ataner Corporation's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 110). (See Order, ECF No. 122.)

Plaintiff April Wells has now moved for reconsideration of the Court's September 26 order. (See Mot. for Reconsideration, ECF No. 124.) The Court has carefully reviewed Wells' motion and concludes that she is not entitled to relief. The Court remains persuaded that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, Wells' motion for reconsideration (ECF No.124) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 30, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

Wells v. Ataner Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 30, 2024
21-cv-11032 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Wells v. Ataner Corp.

Case Details

Full title:APRIL WELLS, Plaintiff, v. ATANER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2024

Citations

21-cv-11032 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2024)