From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Arnold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order, in so far as it denies motion to dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint for insufficiency or to make the complaint more definite and certain and separately state and number the allegations thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In so far as it denies motion to extend defendant's time to answer, order reversed upon the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs; defendant to have ten days from service of a copy of the order herein within which to serve an answer. In the circumstances defendant is entitled to this relief. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells v. Arnold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Wells v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:FRED WELLS, Respondent, v. RAY H. ARNOLD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)