From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Equip. Fin., Inc. v. Mid-South Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO: 10-2970-KDE-SS (E.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from Wells Fargo Fin. Leasing, Inc. v. Boykin

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 10-2970-KDE-SS

02-29-2012

WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC. v. MID-SOUTH SERVICES, INC., et al


ORDER

The Court, after considering the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and finding that as of this date the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the motion of the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. ("Wells Fargo"), to establish amount of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses due to it (Rec. doc. 14) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART; and (2) Wells Fargo is awarded attorneys fees of $4,950.00 and costs of $1,000.66 for a total of $5,950.66 from the defendants, Mid-South Services, Inc., Sharon Larouse and Woody Collins. *

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 29th day of February, 2012.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Equip. Fin., Inc. v. Mid-South Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO: 10-2970-KDE-SS (E.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from Wells Fargo Fin. Leasing, Inc. v. Boykin
Case details for

Wells Fargo Equip. Fin., Inc. v. Mid-South Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC. v. MID-SOUTH SERVICES, INC., et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 10-2970-KDE-SS (E.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Fin. Leasing, Inc. v. Boykin

The twelve Johnson factors are: (1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the…

Conmaco/Rector, L.P. v. L&a Contracting Co.

Of the remaining entries in Conmaco's fee application which were not (a) vague or (b) block billed, they…