This distinction has also been made by other courts. See Wilson v. Brant , 374 Ill. App. 3d 306, 311, 311 Ill.Dec. 805, 869 N.E.2d 818 (2007) (the commencement of a new action under section 13-217 is not a "re-commencement" of the original action); Ramos v. Kewanee Hospital , 2013 IL App (3d) 120001, ¶ 85, 372 Ill.Dec. 564, 992 N.E.2d 103 (same); Wells Fargo Bank v. Zajac , 2017 IL App (1st) 160787, ¶ 17, 2017 WL 1019323 (" Section 13-217 pertains to refiling; it does not apply to reinstatement."). ¶ 14 Lastly, we observe that in answering the certified question our jurisdiction is limited to the question presented to us by the circuit court. Lewis v. NL Industries, Inc. , 2013 IL App (1st) 122080, ¶ 5, 370 Ill.Dec. 421, 988 N.E.2d 197.