From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank v. Fields

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-2815-JTF-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-2815-JTF-cgc

12-10-2013

WELLS FARGO BANK, Plaintiff, v. KARLTON S. FIELDS, and MINISTER I-ARIEL DANIEL: IBN YAWEH 273 FAMILY of YAHWAH, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DENYING DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL, ORDER DISMISSING CASE,

ORDER CERTIFYING APPEAL NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH and

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Before the Court is the Defendant's "Legal Notice of Removal and Counterclaim" and various other attached exhibits, including an "Order Changing Name," a "Commercial Affidavit of Violations and Public/Political Corruption," and "Revised Full Reconveyance" filed on September 19, 2012. (DE #1). On March 25, 2013, this case was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§636- 639. (DE #5). On October 28, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order Correcting the Docket and a Report and Recommendation. (DE #6). After conducting an in forma pauperis screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Magistrate recommended that the matter be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In her report, the Magistrate concluded that Plaintiff's Notice of Removal does not contain an attached state court complaint that Defendant now seeks to remove to federal court; the pleading does not comport with Fed. Rules Civ. P. 7 (a) or 8(a) neither 28 U.S.C. §1446 (a) or 28 U.S.C. §1441(b)(2). Therefore, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the case be dismissed and that a certificate of appealability be denied as not taken in good faith and that defendant be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Fed. Rule App. P. 24(a). No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

On November 6, 2013, the copy of the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation mailed to the Defendant at the address of record was returned to the Clerk of Court as non-deliverable by the United States Postal Service.

After reviewing the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the entire record in this case, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, DENIES Defendant's Notice of Removal, DISMISSES the Case, and DENIES a Certificate of Appealability to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of December, 2013.

_________________________

JOHN T. FOWLKES, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank v. Fields

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-2815-JTF-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, Plaintiff, v. KARLTON S. FIELDS, and MINISTER I-ARIEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-2815-JTF-cgc (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2013)