Opinion
2:20-CV-01887-RFB-EJY
01-16-2022
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Gary L. Compton LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216
Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT
GIZER & McRAE LLP
Kevin S. Sinclair,
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b)
Gary L. Compton
LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 40)
(FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COMES NOW defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) and plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On December 29, 2021, Wells Fargo filed its motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 40);
2. The deadline to respond to Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment is currently January 19, 2022;
3. Fidelity requests a two-week extension of time to respond to the motion for partial summary judgment, until February 2, 2022, to afford Fidelity additional time to respond to the legal arguments set forth in Wells Fargo's motion;
4. Wells Fargo does not oppose the requested extension;
5. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay;
IT IS SO STIPULATED that the deadline to respond to Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 40) is hereby extended through and including February 2, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.