From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 7, 2022
3:19-CV-00241-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 7, 2022)

Opinion

3:19-CV-00241-MMD-WGC

01-07-2022

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-5 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-5, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., As Trustee For Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-5 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-5 EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Scott E. Gizer, Esq. Sophia S. Lau, Esq. Attorney for Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company


WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., As Trustee For Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-5 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-5

EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP

Scott E. Gizer, Esq.

Sophia S. Lau, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME PERIOD TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 26]

[First Request]

Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-5 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-5 (“Wells Fargo”) and Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On December 17, 2021, Wells Fargo filed its First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 25];

2. On December 23, 2021, Fidelity filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 26];

3. Wells Fargo's deadline to respond to Fidelity's Motion to Dismiss is currently January 6, 2022;

4. Wells Fargo's counsel is requesting a brief extension until Thursday, January 20, 2022, to file its response to the pending Motion;

5. This extension is requested to allow counsel for Wells Fargo additional time to review and respond to the points and authorities cited to in the pending Motion due to an unforeseen illness;

6. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension;

7. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 7, 2022
3:19-CV-00241-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 7, 2022

Citations

3:19-CV-00241-MMD-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 7, 2022)