Opinion
3:19-CV-00237-MMD-WGC
11-02-2022
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendant.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Gary L. Compton, State Bar No. 1652 WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216
Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP
Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b)
Gary L. Compton, State Bar No. 1652
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
LINDSAY D. DRAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SECOND REQUEST
MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COMES NOW defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) and plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On July 21, 2022, Wells Fargo filed its motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 33);
2. On August 10, 2022, Fidelity filed its response to Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment and filed its countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 38, 39);
3. On October 5, 2022, Wells Fargo filed its reply in support of its motion for partial summary judgment and response to Fidelity's countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 51, 52);
4. On October 19, 2022, the District Corn! granted a Fidelity a two-week extension of its deadline to file its reply memorandum supporting its countermotion, through and including November 1, 2022 (ECF No. 55);
5. Fidelity requests a brief, two-week extension of time to file the aforementioned memorandum, through and including November 15, 2022, to afford Fidelity additional to respond to the legal arguments set forth in Wells Fargo's brief;
6. Wells Fargo does not oppose the requested extension;
7. This is the second request for an extension, which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay;
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Fidelity's deadline to file its reply memorandum supporting its countermotion for partial summary judgment is hereby extended through and including November 15, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.