Opinion
3:19-cv-00237-MMD-CSD
08-22-2022
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of August 1, 2005 Park Place Securities, Inc. Asset-Backed Pass- Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ4 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Attorney for Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of August 1, 2005 Park Place Securities, Inc. Asset-Backed Pass- Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ4
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Attorney for Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION AND COUNTERMOTION [ECF NO. 38-39]
[FIRST REQUEST]
Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of August 1, 2005 Park Place Securities, Inc. Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ4 (“Wells Fargo”), and Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”, collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On July 21, 2022, Wells Fargo filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 33].
2. On August 10, 2022, Fidelity filed its Opposition to Wells Fargo's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 38] and filed a Countermotion for Partial Summary1
Judgment [ECF No. 39].
3. Wells Fargo's deadline to respond to Fidelity's Opposition is August 24, 2022, while its deadline to respond to Fidelity's Countermotion is August 31, 2022.
4. Wells Fargo requests a thirty-seven (37) day extension of time to file its response to Fidelity's Opposition to Wells Fargo's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 38] and a thirty (30) day extension of time to file its response to Fidelity's Countermotion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 39], such that the deadlines shall both fall on September 30, 2022. The extension is requested to afford Wells Fargo's counsel additional time to review and respond to the arguments in Fidelity's Opposition and Countermotion.
5. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension.
6. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2