Wells Fargo Bank v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

Full title: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

2:20-CV-01887-RFB-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-01887-RFB-EJY

04-21-2022

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.

SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

RICHARD F. BOULWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY.

WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERMOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 49) (THIRD REQUEST)

RICHARD F. BOULWARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

COMES NOW defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) and plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. On December 29, 2021, Wells Fargo filed its motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 40);

1

2. On February 16, 2022, Fidelity filed an opposition to Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment and filed a countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 48, 49);

3. On March 22, 2022, the Court granted the parties' first stipulation for an extension of time to reply in support of the countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 53);

4. On April 8, 2022 the Court granted the parties' second stipulation for an extension of time to reply in support of the countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 55);

5. Fidelity requests a further one-week extension of its deadline to file its reply in support of the countermotion for partial summary judgment, through and including April 27, 2022, to afford Fidelity additional time to respond to the legal arguments set forth in Wells Fargo's opposition;

6. Wells Fargo does not oppose the requested extension;

7. This is the third request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay;

IT IS SO STIPULATED that Fidelity's deadline to reply in support of its countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 49) is extended through and including April 27, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2