Opinion
2:20-CV-01887-RFB-EJY
01-31-2022
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP KEVIN S. SINCLAIR FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
KEVIN S. SINCLAIR
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
LINDSAY D. DRAGON
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 40)
(SECOND REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COMES NOW defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) and plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On December 29, 2021, Wells Fargo filed its motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 40);
2. On January 16, 2022, the Court granted the parties' first stipulation to extend the time for Fidelity to respond to Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 44);
3. Fidelity requests a further, two-week extension of time to respond to the motion for partial summary judgment, through and including February 16, 2022, to afford Fidelity additional time to respond to the legal arguments set forth in Wells Fargo's motion;
4. Wells Fargo does not oppose the requested extension;
5. This is the second request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay;
IT IS SO STIPULATED that the deadline to respond to Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 40) is hereby extended through and including February 16, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.