From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. DeSouza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2015
126 A.D.3d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2014-04209

03-25-2015

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, respondent, v. Garvin DeSOUZA, appellant, et al., defendants.

Bryer & David, New York, N.Y. (Marvin M. David of counsel), for appellant. McNamee, Lochner, Titus & Williams, P.C., Albany, N.Y. (Kenneth L. Gellhaus of counsel), for respondent.


Bryer & David, New York, N.Y. (Marvin M. David of counsel), for appellant.

McNamee, Lochner, Titus & Williams, P.C., Albany, N.Y. (Kenneth L. Gellhaus of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Garvin DeSouza appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated March 10, 2014, as granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against him and to appoint a referee.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this foreclosure action by producing the mortgage, the unpaid note, and evidence of the appellant's default in payment (see One W. Bank, FSB v. DiPilato, 124 A.D.3d 735, 998 N.Y.S.2d 668 ; Peak Fin. Partners, Inc. v. Brook, 119 A.D.3d 539, 987 N.Y.S.2d 916 ; Emigrant Mtge. Co., Inc. v. Beckerman, 105 A.D.3d 895, 964 N.Y.S.2d 548 ). In opposition, the appellant failed to submit evidence in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to a bona fide defense (see Independence Bank v. Valentine, 113 A.D.3d 62, 976 N.Y.S.2d 504 ; Baron Assoc., LLC v. Garcia Group Enters., Inc., 96 A.D.3d 793, 946 N.Y.S.2d 611 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellant and to appoint a referee (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572 ).

The appellant's remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time on appeal.

MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. DeSouza

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 25, 2015
126 A.D.3d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. DeSouza

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, respondent, v. Garvin DeSOUZA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
126 A.D.3d 965
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2470

Citing Cases

Wilmington Trust Co. v. Hurtado

on a reading of the cross moving papers, the court finds that defendant Hurtado's demands for dismissal of…

Wilmington Trust Co. v. Hurtado

ading of the cross moving papers, the court finds that defendant Hurtado's demands for dismissal of the…