From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. v. Walsam 36 Del.

Supreme Court, New York County
Apr 26, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 31547 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2024)

Opinion

Index No. 850538/2023 Motion Seq. No. 002

04-26-2024

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE HOLDERS OF COMM 2018-COR3 MORTGAGE TRUST COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2018-COR3, Plaintiff, v. WALSAM 36 DELAWARE LLC,DAVID BERLEY, NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NYS DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, NYC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS, NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN DOE NO. 1 THROUGH JOHN DOE NO. 100 Defendant.


Unpublished Opinion

PRESENT: HON. FRANCIS A. KAHN, III Justice

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION

HON. FRANCIS A. KAHN, J.S.C.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 were read on this motion to/for APPOINT - FIDUCIARY.

The court sua sponte vacates its decision and order dated February 23, 2024, as it was intended as a decision on Motion Sequence Number 1, and substitutes the following in its place and stead:

Upon the foregoing documents, the motion is determined as follows:

In this action to foreclose on a mortgage encumbering commercial real property located at 315-325 36th Street, New York, New York (Block 760, Lot 26), Plaintiff moves pursuant to RPL §254[10] and RPAPL §1325 for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the rents of the mortgaged premises. Defendants oppose the motion.

In section 3.2 of the Mortgage at issue it is provided, in pertinent part, as follows:

Remedies. In addition to any other rights and remedies which Mortgagee may have under this Mortgage, the Loan Agreement, and the other Loan Documents or pursuant to law or equity, and without limitation thereof (but subject to any applicable conditions and limitations expressly set forth in this Mortgage or the other Loan Documents), upon and at any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of any Event of Default, Mortgagee at any time may take such lawful action as Mortgagee deems advisable to protect and enforce its rights against Mortgagor and in and to the Mortgaged Property, including the following actions, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law, each of which may be pursued concurrently or otherwise, at such time and in such order as Mortgagee may determine in its sole discretion, without impairing or otherwise affecting the other rights and remedies of Mortgagee:

[h] apply for the appointment of a custodian, trustee, receiver, liquidator or conservator of the Mortgaged Property, without notice and without regard for the adequacy of the security for the indebtedness secured hereby and without regard for the solvency of Mortgagor, any guarantor or of any Person liable for the payment of the indebtedness secured hereby, and Mortgagor hereby consents to the appointment of such a receiver selected by Mortgagee, and will not oppose any such appointment.

Under Real Property Law §254[10], the appointment of a receiver in the event of a default is proper where the parties to the mortgage agree to same even without notice or without regard to the sufficiency of security (see ADHY Advisors LLC. v 530 W. 152nd St. LLC, 82 A.D.3d 619 [1st Dept 2011]; 366 Fourth St. Corp, v Foxfire Enters., 149 A.D.2d 692 [2nd Dept 1989]). Despite the parties' assent, the appointment is not perfunctory and the Court, in the exercise of its equitable power, retains the discretion to deny the appointment of a receiver (see ADHY Advisors LLC. v 530 W. 152nd St. LLC, supra; Nechadim Corp, v Simmons, 171 A.D.3d 1195, 1197 [2d Dept 2019]).

In the present case, it is undisputed that the parties' mortgage provides that Plaintiff may apply for the appointment of a receiver regardless of the adequacy of the property as security and Plaintiff pled that Defendants, inter alia, defaulted in repayment of the indebtedness. Accordingly, Plaintiff established its entitlement to the appointment of a receiver of the mortgaged premises (see eg SLAV Hillside Bleeker Lender LLC v 145 Bleeker LLC, 217 DD3d 536 [1st Dept 2023]; CSFB 2004-C3 Bronx Apts LLC v Sinckler, Inc., 96 A.D.3d 680 [1st Dept 2012]).

In opposition, Defendants have not demonstrated that denial of the appointment of a receiver is an appropriate exercise of the Court's discretion (see id.', U.S. Bank, N.A. v Rufai, 202 A.D.3d 719, 721 [2d Dept 2022]; Shaw Funding, LP v Bennett, 185 A.D.3d 857, 858 [2nd Dept 2020]). Notably, Defendants have not demonstrated that issues exist as to the validity of the mortgage or whether a payment default has in fact occurred (cf. Phoenix Grantor Trust v Exclusive Hospitality, LLC, 172 A.D.3d 926 [2d Dept 2019]).

To the extent Defendants' opposition is based on cases where appointment of a receiver was sought pursuant to CPLR §6401 it is unavailing (see eg Groh v Halloran, 86 A.D.2d 30 [1st Dept 1982]). The Appellate Division cases are clear that where, as here, the mortgage contains a provision that a lender may "without notice and without regard for the adequacy of the security for the Debt and without regard for the solvency of Borrower'", under RPL §254[ 10], that provision denotes that a mortgagee may apply for a receiver "'regardless of proving the necessity for the appointment'" (see GECMC 2007-C1 Ditmars Lodging, LLC v Mohola, LLC, 84 A.D.3d 1311, 1312 [2d Dept 2011], citing Naar v. I. J. Litwak & Co., 260 A.D.2d 613 [2d Dept 1999]; see also SKW Hillside Bleeker Lender LLC v 145 Bleeker LLC, supra).

Concerning the receiver proposed by Plaintiff, Defendants posit that a conflict of interest exists which precludes their appointment. At the outset, such an objection is not a basis to nullify the request for the appointment entirely. This Court is not compelled to appoint Plaintiffs preferred receiver and may substitute a fiduciary of its own choosing.

There is limited appellate case authority concerning the nature and extent of any ethical grounds for prophylactically barring a proposed receiver from serving. Nevertheless, disqualification of a receiver for a conflict of interest has been recognized (see Bank of Tokyo Trust Co. v Urban Food Malls, 229 A.D.2d 14, 30 [1st Dept 1996]; Dubiner v Goldman, 42 A.D.2d 843 [2d Dept 1973]). Moreover, removal of a receiver is statutorily authorized (see CPLR § 6405; Whalen v Barlow, 114 A.D.2d 623 [3d Dept 1985]). Relatedly, the necessity that a receiver act fairly is, at the very least, implicit in the nature of the appointment. "A receiver is a fiduciary and an officer of the court who acts at its direction and on its behalf' (Coronet Capital Co. v Spodek, 279 A.D.2d 600, 602 [2d Dept 2000]). In other words, a receiver acts in a quasi-judicial capacity which has been described as "the hand of the court" (.see Copeland v Salomon, 56 N.Y.2d 222, 228 [1982]). Conversely, the Court could find no authority mandating automatic disqualification of a receiver, proposed or otherwise, under the present circumstances. It must also be recognized that Defendant/Mortgagor, as a sophisticated business entity represented by counsel, expressly agreed, in an arms-length commercial transaction, to the appointment of a receiver of Plaintiff s selection. Further, Plaintiffs counsel's previous representation of the proposed receiver was not in a personal matter, but rather in his official capacity as a receiver appointed in other cases. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds Plaintiffs proposed receiver is not required to be disqualified from consideration (see Trust v 325 Third Ave. LLC, Misc.3d, 2022 WL 2793450, at *2 [Sup Ct NY Cty 2022]).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion for the appointment of a Temporary Receiver is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Chris Neilson, Diduciary LD. No. 130218, is hereby appointed with the usual powers and directions of a Temporary Receiver for the benefit of Plaintiff of all the rents and profits now due and unpaid or become due during the pendency of this action and issuing out the mortgaged property mentioned in the complaint, known by the street addresses as: 315-325 36th Street, New York, New York (Block 760, Lot 26); and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is authorized to take charge and enter into possession of the property; and it is further

ORDERED that before entering her/his duties, the Temporary Receiver shall be sown to fairly and faithfully discharge the duties committed to him and shall execute to the People of the State of New York and file with the Clerk of the Court an undertaking in the sum of $250,000.00 conditioned for the faithful discharge of the duties of Temporary Receiver; and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is hereby directed to demand, collect and receive from the occupants, tenants and licensees in possession of said premises, or other persons liable therefor, inclusive of the mortgagor, all the rents and license fees thereof now due or unpaid or hereafter that become fixed or due and the Temporary Receiver is authorized to institute and carry on all legal proceedings necessary for the protection of said premises or to recover possession of the whole, or any part thereof, and apply to this Court to fix reasonable rental value and license fee value and to compel the tenants and occupants to attorn to the Temporary Receiver; and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver may institute and prosecute suits for the collection of rent, license fees and other charges now due or hereafter to become due and fixed, and summary proceedings for the removal of any tenants or licensees or other persons therefrom; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to the General Obligation Law section 7-105, anybody holding any deposits or advances of rental as security under any lease or license agreement affecting space in the premises affected by this action shall turn same over to said Temporary Receiver within five (5) days after said Temporary Receiver shall be qualified; and thereupon the said Temporary Receiver shall hold such security subject to such disposition thereof as shall be provided in an Order of the Court to be made and entered in this action; and it is further

ORDERED that anybody in possession of same shall turn over to said Temporary Receiver all rent lists, orders, unexpired and expired leases, agreements, correspondence, notices and registration statements relating to rental spaces or facilities in the premises; and it is further

ORDERED that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this order, the Temporary Receiver shall not, without the further, prior order of this Court, upon prior notice to the plaintiff, make improvements or substantial repairs to the property at a cost in excess of $5,000.00, except that in an emergency, if funds need to be expended in excess of $5,000.00 or would otherwise require Court intervention, no Court approval will be necessary if counsel for plaintiff agrees in writing that the receiver may make such disbursement; and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver shall deposit all monies received by her/him into any FDIC-insured bank where she has an account for this purpose and such account shall show the name of this action and the Temporary Receiver shall furnish plaintiffs attorneys with monthly statements of the receipts and expenditures of the Receivership together with a photocopy of the monthly statements received from said depository and no withdrawals shall be made therefrom except as directed by the Court or on a draft or check signed by the Temporary Receiver; and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is authorized from time to time to rent and lease any part of the premises for terms not exceeding five (5) years or such longer terms as may be required by applicable laws or regulations; to keep the premises insured against loss by damage or fire; to pay the taxes, assessments, water rates, sewer rates, vault rents, salaries of employees, supplies and other charges; to comply with all lawful requirements of any municipal department or other authority of the municipality in which the mortgaged premises are situated and to procure such fire, liability and other insurance as may be reasonably necessary; and it is further

ORDERED, that the tenants, licensees or other persons in possession of said premises attorn to the Temporary Receiver and pay over to the Temporary Receiver all rents, license fees, and other charges of such premises now due and unpaid or that may hereafter become due; and that the defendants be enjoined and restrained from collecting the rents, license fees and other charges of said premises from interfering in any manner with the property or its possession; and from transferring, removing or in any way disturbing and of the occupants or employees; and that all tenants, occupants, employees and licensees of the premises and other persons liable for the rents be and hereby are enjoined and restrained from paying any rent or license fees or other charges for such premises to the defendants, their agents, servants or attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is prohibited from incurring obligations in excess of the monies in her hands without further Order of this Court or written consent of Plaintiff s attorney and Plaintiff may advance money, which can be recouped in this litigation; and it is further

ORDERED that the Owner turn over to the Temporary Receiver all rents collected from and after the date of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that all persons now and hereafter in possession of said premises, or any part thereof, and not holding such possession under valid and existing leases or tendencies, do forthwith surrender such possession to the Temporary Receiver, subject to emergency laws, if any, and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver after paying the expenses of the management and care of the said premises as above provided retain the balance of the monies which may come into his hands until the sale of the said premises under the judgment to be entered in this action and/or until further Order of this Court, and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver, or any party hereto, may at any time, on proper notice to all parties who have appeared in this action, apply to the Court for further and other instructions or powers necessary to enable the Temporary Receiver to properly fulfill her duties or for interim fee payments; and it is further

ORDERED that the appointed named herein shall comply with Section 35a of the Judiciary Law, Sections 6401-6404 of the CPLR, Section 1325 of RPAPL and Rule 36 of the Chief Judge; and it is further

ORDERED that notwithstanding any other provision of this order, the Temporary Receiver shall not appoint an attorney, managing agent, appraiser, auctioneer or accountant without prior order of this । Court, and that the receiver shall apply to the court and file a separate application for appointment of a' managing agent, attorney or other managing services pursuant to 36.1 of the Uniform Court Rules.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. v. Walsam 36 Del.

Supreme Court, New York County
Apr 26, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 31547 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2024)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n as Tr. v. Walsam 36 Del.

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Apr 26, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 31547 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2024)