Opinion
Civil Case No. 05-cv-02481-LTB-BNB.
May 27, 2008
ORDER
This case is before me on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Counterclaims and for Remand to State Court (Doc 39) be granted insofar as it seeks remand of this action to state court for lack of jurisdiction and denied without prejudice in all other respects (Doc 93). By separate recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants' Verified Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 38) be denied (Doc 92).
Defendants have filed specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. I have therefore reviewed the recommendations de novo in light of the file and record in this case. On de novo review, I conclude that the recommendations are correct. Accordingly
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Counterclaims and for Remand to State Court be GRANTED insofar as it seeks remand of this action to the state court and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Verified Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above action is REMANDED to the state court from which it was removed.