From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank v. Edwards

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Sep 16, 2020
186 A.D.3d 1457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–06291 Index No. 605722/15

09-16-2020

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., respondent, v. Sylvia EDWARDS, appellant, et al., defendants.

The Ranalli Law Group, PLLC, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Ernest E. Ranalli of counsel), for appellant. Aldridge Pite, LLP (David W. Groeger and Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Marissa Banez ], of counsel), for respondent.


The Ranalli Law Group, PLLC, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Ernest E. Ranalli of counsel), for appellant.

Aldridge Pite, LLP (David W. Groeger and Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Marissa Banez ], of counsel), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Sylvia Edwards appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Joseph A. Santorelli, J.), dated April 24, 2019. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that defendant's motion for leave to renew and reargue her opposition to those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against her, for summary judgment dismissing her first and fifth affirmative defenses and first and second counterclaims, and for an order of reference, which had been granted in two orders of the same court dated November 5, 2018. ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion of the defendant Sylvia Edwards (hereinafter the defendant) which was for leave to reargue must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument (see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Spanos, 180 A.D.3d 997, 120 N.Y.S.3d 83 ). The remainder of the appeal, from so much of the order as denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was for leave to renew, has been rendered academic by our determination in the companion appeals from the orders dated November 5, 2018 (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Edwards, 186 A.D.3d 1455, 129 N.Y.S.3d 20 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2019–01262 ; decided herewith] ).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, MALTESE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank v. Edwards

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Sep 16, 2020
186 A.D.3d 1457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., etc., respondent, v. Sylvia Edwards, appellant, et…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Sep 16, 2020

Citations

186 A.D.3d 1457 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
128 N.Y.S.3d 862
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4994

Citing Cases

Underhill Venture, LLC v. Sarang

The appeal from so much of the order entered December 18, 2023, as denied that branch of the plaintiff's…

Maddaloni v. Maddaloni

The defendant appeals. That branch of the defendant's motion which was, in effect, for leave to reargue that…