From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Decesare

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2017
148 A.D.3d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-01-2017

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., plaintiff, v. Angela DECESARE, appellant, et al., defendant.

Vincent Volino PLLC, Yonkers, NY, for appellant. Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, Rochester, NY (Frances M. Kabat and Richard Mullen of counsel), for plaintiff.


Vincent Volino PLLC, Yonkers, NY, for appellant.

Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, Rochester, NY (Frances M. Kabat and Richard Mullen of counsel), for plaintiff.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JOSEPH J. MALTESE and COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Angela DeCesare appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered March 24, 2016, which denied her unopposed motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate an order of reference of the same court dated October 21, 2014, entered upon her failure to appear or answer the complaint, and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her for lack of personal jurisdiction.

ORDERED that the order entered March 24, 2016, is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion of the defendant Angela DeCesare pursuant to CPLR 5014(a)(4) to vacate the order of reference dated October 21, 2014, and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted, and the order of reference dated October 21, 2014, is vacated.

The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage on property owned by the defendant Angela DeCesare and obtained an order of reference upon DeCesare's failure to appear or answer the complaint. Thereafter, DeCesare moved pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate the order of reference and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her for lack of personal jurisdiction, asserting that she was never served with the summons and complaint. The plaintiff did not oppose the motion. The Supreme Court denied the motion.

The detailed and specific evidence submitted by DeCesare in support of her motion was sufficient to rebut the allegations contained in the process server's affidavit of service, thereby shifting the burden of proof to the plaintiff to establish jurisdiction at a hearing by a preponderance of the evidence (see Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Chaplin, 65 A.D.3d 588, 589, 884 N.Y.S.2d 254 ; Bankers Trust Co. of Cal. v. Tsoukas, 303 A.D.2d 343, 344, 756 N.Y.S.2d 92 ). However, because the plaintiff, which was well aware of the existence of the motion, elected not to file any opposition papers, no hearing was required, and the Supreme Court should have granted DeCesare's unopposed motion and vacated the order of reference (see Walter v. Jones, Sledzik, Garneau & Nardone, LLP, 67 A.D.3d 671, 889 N.Y.S.2d 197 ).


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Decesare

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2017
148 A.D.3d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Decesare

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc., plaintiff, v. Angela DECESARE, appellant, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 1, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
48 N.Y.S.3d 497
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 1592

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Roche

The holding in US 1 Brookville Real Estate Corp. v. Spallone , 21 AD3d 480 (2d Dept 2005) rests on the fact…

Mileski v. MSC Indus. Direct Co.

Further, Buffalo did not sufficiently rebut that presumption (seeStephan B. Gleigh & Assoc. v Gritsipis, 87…