From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bundschuh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
Case No. SACV 13-0629-DOC(RNBx) (C.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. SACV 13-0629-DOC(RNBx)

05-09-2013

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. CHRISTIAN D. BUNDSCHUH, ET AL.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable David O. Carter, U.S. District Court Judge

+--------------------------------------------------+ ¦Julie Barrera ¦Not Present ¦n/a ¦ +---------------+-------------------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk ¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦Tape No.¦ +--------------------------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Proceedings:

IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.

The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than MAY 28, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution.

As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.

Defendant's answer to complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.

Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties who have not yet appeared in this action.

_____________ : 00

Initials of Preparer jcb


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bundschuh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
Case No. SACV 13-0629-DOC(RNBx) (C.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bundschuh

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. CHRISTIAN D. BUNDSCHUH, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Case No. SACV 13-0629-DOC(RNBx) (C.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)