From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 23, 1924
257 S.W. 1098 (Tex. Crim. App. 1924)

Opinion

No. 8098.

Decided January 23, 1924.

Murder — Companion Case — Jury and Jury Law.

The questions sought to be propounded to the jurors on their voir dire examination to enable appellant to exercise his peremptory challenges were the same as discussed in a companion case. Following Belcher v. State, No. 8353, and the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas. Tried below before the Honorable C.A. Pippen.

Appeal from a conviction of murder; penalty, forty years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

No brief on file for appellant.

Tom Garrard and Grover C. Morris, Assistants Attorney General, and Shelby S. Cox, District Attorney, for the State.


Conviction is for murder; punishment, forty years in the penitentiary.

This is a companion case to Belcher v. State, (No. 8353) this day decided. The prosecutions grew out of the same killing. The questions sought to be propounded to the jurors on their voir dire examination to enable appellant to exercise his peremptory challenges were the same as discussed in Belcher's case. The identical point is presented by the bill of exceptions in this case, and the same ruling must result.

The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Welk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 23, 1924
257 S.W. 1098 (Tex. Crim. App. 1924)
Case details for

Welk v. State

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY WELK v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 23, 1924

Citations

257 S.W. 1098 (Tex. Crim. App. 1924)
257 S.W. 1098

Citing Cases

State v. Hoelscher

" This was error because the information sought was certainly calculated to have enabled appellant to…

Pearce v. State

This court has several times held that it was error to refuse to permit the appellant to interrogate the…