From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welgamage v. Garland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 22, 2022
22 Civ. 8005 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 8005 (AT)

09-22-2022

SUSANTHA PREMALAL WELGAMAGE, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; ANDREA QUARANTILLO, District Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, New York District Office, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Welgamage v. Garland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 22, 2022
22 Civ. 8005 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Welgamage v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:SUSANTHA PREMALAL WELGAMAGE, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 22, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 8005 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2022)