Opinion
October 5, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.
Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The court properly continued in effect the temporary order of maintenance and child support, even though the cause of action for a divorce had been dismissed, because the issues of maintenance and child support remained for determination (see, Blisko v. Blisko, 149 A.D.2d 127, 129; Gunn v. Gunn, 143 A.D.2d 393, 396).