Summary
In Stewart v. Welch, supra, it was held that a contract whereby the claim was assigned to Welch, who brought suit in his own name, could not be enforced, since the contract was made for the purpose of carrying on litigation without expense to and free from control of the assignor who was to receive nothing except a share of the recovery.
Summary of this case from LoGuidice v. HarrisOpinion
No. 81-C-2270.
October 16, 1981.
In re A. J. Harrell, applying for writ of certiorari, or review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Tangipahoa. No. 14148.
Denied.
DENNIS and BLANCHE, JJ., would grant the writ.