From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welch v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2014
121 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-2

In the Matter of Howard WELCH, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Howard Welch, Johnstown, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Howard Welch, Johnstown, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

An investigation into a drug operation revealed that petitioner had conspired to bring marihuana and synthetic marihuana into the correctional facility. As a consequence, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, possession of contraband and possession of drugs. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential information, reviewed in camera, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt with regard to the smuggling and possession of contraband and drug charges ( see Matter of Carrero v. Fischer, 106 A.D.3d 1299, 1299, 964 N.Y.S.2d 917 [2013]; Matter of Flanders v. Fischer, 105 A.D.3d 1238, 1239, 962 N.Y.S.2d 827 [2013] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the fact that he was never found to be in possession of marihuana or synthetic marihuana does not negate his guilt, as a violation of the rules occurred when petitioner conspired to bring these items into the facility ( see7 NYCRR 270.2[B][14] [xiii], [xv]; 270.3[b]; Matter of Maldonado v. New York State Dept. of Corr. Servs., 97 A.D.3d 873, 874, 947 N.Y.S.2d 685 [2012]; Matter of Sanders v. LaClair, 67 A.D.3d 1226, 1227, 890 N.Y.S.2d 136 [2009] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. PETERS, P.J., GARRY, EGAN JR., LYNCH and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Welch v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2014
121 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Welch v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Howard WELCH, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 2, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
121 A.D.3d 1139
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6625

Citing Cases

Moore v. Venettozzi

Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Preliminarily, “the minor omissions…

Harris v. Annucci

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, hearing testimony, documentary evidence and confidential information…