From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welch v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Nov 2, 2012
2:12-cv-02484 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2012)

Opinion

2:12-cv-02484

11-02-2012

DONALD WELCH ET AL., Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL., Defendant.

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General PAUL STEIN, State Bar No. 184956 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for All Defendants Respectfully submitted, KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER Supervising Deputy Attorney General PAUL STEIN Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for All Defendants Kevin T. Snider (SBN 170988) Michael J. Peffer (SBN 192265) Matthew B. McReynolds (SBN 234797) Kevin T. Snider Attorneys for All Plaintiffs


KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
PAUL STEIN, State Bar No. 184956
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for All Defendants

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS'

TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


Judge:

The Honorable William B.

Shubb

Plaintiffs Donald Welch, et al. and Defendants Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, et al., hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

(1) Plaintiffs filed their complaint in this action on October 1, 2012, and served the summons and complaint on Defendants on October 22, 2012;

(2) On October 29, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, and set the hearing on their motion for December 3, 2012;

(3) Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action is November 12, 2012, and their opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is due November 19, 2012; and

(4) In the interest of conserving party and judicial resources, and in the efficient and orderly administration of this case, Defendants should not be required to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action until after this Court has ruled on Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. No other extensions of time have been requested by either Plaintiffs or Defendants in this case.

Now, based on the foregoing, the parties further stipulate and agree that Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to to the complaint in this action shall be twenty-eight (28) days after this Court issues a decision on Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction.

Respectfully submitted,

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

TAMAR PACHTER

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

PAUL STEIN

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for All Defendants

Kevin T. Snider (SBN 170988)

Michael J. Peffer (SBN 192265)

Matthew B. McReynolds (SBN 234797)

Kevin T. Snider

Attorneys for All Plaintiffs
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Welch v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Nov 2, 2012
2:12-cv-02484 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Welch v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:DONALD WELCH ET AL., Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. GOVERNOR OF THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 2, 2012

Citations

2:12-cv-02484 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2012)