From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wek v. Gurule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Aug 14, 2015
No. CV-15-00103-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 2015)

Opinion

No. CV-15-00103-PHX-SPL

08-14-2015

William Wek, Petitioner, v. Jon M. Gurule, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner William Wek has filed a First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 17). The Honorable James F. Metcalf, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 38), recommending that the Court dismiss the amended petition. Judge Metcalf advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 38 at 7) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well- taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and dismiss this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions."). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is accepted and adopted by the Court;

2. That the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 17) is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and

3. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wek v. Gurule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Aug 14, 2015
No. CV-15-00103-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Wek v. Gurule

Case Details

Full title:William Wek, Petitioner, v. Jon M. Gurule, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

No. CV-15-00103-PHX-SPL (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 2015)