Nonetheless, the time for Plaintiffs' counsel to seek to compel further action by Defendants' counsel has passed, as it is well-settled that "[a] motion for reconsideration is not the proper vehicle for advancing a new argument or seeking new relief." Weitzner v. Cynosure, Inc., No. 12-CV-3668, 2014 WL 508237, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2014), appeal dismissed, 802 F.3d 307 (2d Cir. 2015), as corrected (Oct. 27, 2015); see Azkour, 2014 WL 6481969, at *1; see also Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Glob. Markets, Inc., 301 F.R.D. 31, 46 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) ("Because plaintiff is now making a new argument and seeking new relief that it could have (and should have) sought in response to defendants' motion to strike, its application is not properly brought as a motion for reconsideration or clarification."). Finally, the Court notes that much of the new relief Plaintiffs' counsel requests in his motion for reconsideration is rendered moot by Defendants' subsequent submissions.