From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weitzer Oak Park Estate v. Petto

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 25, 1991
573 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding that pursuant to section 57.041, "every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment"

Summary of this case from Miami Beach Club Motel Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. RDR Seashore, LLC

Opinion

Nos. 90-375, 90-376.

January 29, 1991. Rehearing Denied February 25, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Richard S. Fuller, J.

Margulies Rones, P.A., and Bruce M. Margulies, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Ludovici Ludovici, P.A., and Helene L. Daniel, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.


In consolidated appeals, Weitzer Oak Park Estates, Ltd., Weitzer Estates, Inc., and Weitzer Construction Corp. appeal from a final judgment in an action by five homeowners for loss of use of residential real property and from an order denying rehearing. Weitzer Communities Ltd., Weitzer Group Inc., Harry Weitzer, and Weitzer Oak Park Estates, Inc., appeal from an order denying costs following final judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

We affirm the final judgment and the order denying rehearing. The plaintiffs, homeowners, introduced sufficient evidence of damages for loss of use of their real property to support the jury verdict. See Horn v. Corkland Corp., 518 So.2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (owner of property can testify to value of his property); Harbond, Inc. v. Anderson, 134 So.2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961) (same); 24 Fla.Jur.2d § 650 (1981) (where value of property at issue, opinions of property owners as to value of property proper whether property is real or personal). See also Watson v. Jones, 160 Fla. 819, 36 So.2d 788 (1948).

We reverse the order denying costs to appellants/defendants, Weitzer Communities, Ltd., Weitzer Group, Inc., Harry Weitzer, and Weitzer Oak Park Estates, Inc. The trial court entered final judgment in favor of three of these defendants, and the fourth was voluntarily dismissed. Under section 57.041, Florida Statutes (1987), every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment. Board of St. Johns River Water Management Dist. v. Lake Pickett Ltd., 543 So.2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Dragstrem v. Butts, 370 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). We glean from the record that many of the costs incurred by Harry Weitzer, individually, and the Weitzer corporate developers involved in this action are overlapping and that all of these defendants were represented by the same attorney. We suggest that the trial court carefully scrutinize the costs incurred before entering an appropriate cost award to the prevailing defendants.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Weitzer Oak Park Estate v. Petto

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 25, 1991
573 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

holding that pursuant to section 57.041, "every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment"

Summary of this case from Miami Beach Club Motel Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. RDR Seashore, LLC

stating that "every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment"

Summary of this case from Sherman v. Sherman

stating that "every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment"

Summary of this case from City of Boca Raton v. Basso

stating that under the statute, "every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment."

Summary of this case from Tacher v. Mathews
Case details for

Weitzer Oak Park Estate v. Petto

Case Details

Full title:WEITZER OAK PARK ESTATE, LTD.; WEITZER GROUP, INC.; WEITZER COMMUNITIES…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 25, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Sherman v. Sherman

This unambiguous language need not be construed." Hendry Tractor Co. v. Fernandez , 432 So. 2d 1315, 1316…

W.S.M. v. Dept. of Hlth. Rehab

Again with exceptions not pertinent here, the language of section 57.041 conditions a prevailing party's…