Weitzel v. Griffin Associates

2 Citing cases

  1. In the Interest of T. A. W

    214 Ga. App. 1 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 2 times

    Yet in White Repair Co. v. Oviedo, 188 Ga. App. 672, 674 (3) ( 373 S.E.2d 784) (1988), we regarded the transfer provision as self-executing, citing it and a pre-rule case ( Edwards v. Edmondson, 173 Ga. App. 353, 355 ( 326 S.E.2d 550) (1985) (physical precedent)), as sole authority without mentioning the Uniform Transfer Rules which were already in effect. Also in Weitzel v. Griffin Assoc., 192 Ga. App. 89 ( 383 S.E.2d 653) (1989), the Constitution was regarded as the authority requiring transfer rather than dismissal; no mention is made of the rules. The Supreme Court, in Bosma v. Gunter, 258 Ga. 664 ( 373 S.E.2d 368) (1988), transferred an appeal to the superior court on the strength of the constitutional provision alone.

  2. Goodman v. Vilston, Inc.

    197 Ga. App. 718 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 8 times

    Bergen v. Martindale-Hubbell, 245 Ga. 742, 743 (2) ( 267 S.E.2d 10) (1980). Accord Weitzel v. Griffin Assoc., 192 Ga. App. 89 ( 383 S.E.2d 653) (1989); see generally Gary, "Annual Survey of Georgia Law: Trial Practice and Procedure," 32 Mercer L. Rev. 225, 230-232 (1981). We find this rationale equally applicable in the circumstance present in the instant case.