From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weitsman v. Levesque

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
19-CV-461 JLS (AHG) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

19-CV-461 JLS (AHG)

04-20-2022

ADAM WEITSMAN; UPSTATE SHREDDING, LLC, a New York limited liability company; WEITSMAN SHREDDING, LLC, a New York limited liability company; and WEITSMAN RECYCLING, LLC, a New York limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT ARTHUR LEVESQUE, III, Defendant.


ORDER (1) DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO UPDATE DEFENDANT'S MAILING ADDRESS AND TO RESEND THE APRIL 12, 2022 ORDER; AND (2) EXTENDING DEADLINE SET IN THE APRIL 12, 2022 ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND THERETO

(ECF Nos. 120-21)

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge

On April 12, 2022, the Court issued an Order temporarily vacating the hearing on Plaintiffs Adam Weitsman; Upstate Shredding, LLC; Weitsman Shredding, LLC; and Weitsman Recycling, LLC's (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Order to Show Cause Regarding Contempt Against Defendant, and for Order Imposing Sanctions (“Sanctions Mot., ” ECF No. 113), and directing Defendant Robert Arthur Levesque, III (“Defendant”), to make an election regarding his representation at the hearing thereon. See generally ECF No. 120 (the “Order”). On April 19, 2022, the Order was returned to the Court as undeliverable. See ECF No. 121. However, the Court notes that, in his Opposition to the Sanctions Motion, Defendant provided a different mailing address than that presently on record with the Court. Compare ECF No. 117 at 1, with Docket.

In light of the foregoing, the Court:

1. DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to update Defendant's mailing address to the following:

819 University Avenue, Room 706
San Diego, California 92103

2. DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to resend the April 12, 2022 Order to Defendant at his new mailing address; and

3. EXTENDS the deadline for Defendant to make his election regarding counsel in accordance with the Order to up to an including May 26, 2022, given the time that has elapsed since the Order's issuance. The Court further takes this opportunity to remind Defendant of his obligation to keep the Court and opposing counsel apprised of his current mailing address. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 83.11(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Weitsman v. Levesque

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
19-CV-461 JLS (AHG) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Weitsman v. Levesque

Case Details

Full title:ADAM WEITSMAN; UPSTATE SHREDDING, LLC, a New York limited liability…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

19-CV-461 JLS (AHG) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)