From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weissman v. Weissman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 1, 2003
99 N.Y.2d 638 (N.Y. 2003)

Opinion

189

Decided April 1, 2003.


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the appeal from the QDRO, dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court's order denying appellant's motion to vacate the QDRO and stipulation, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.


Summaries of

Weissman v. Weissman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 1, 2003
99 N.Y.2d 638 (N.Y. 2003)
Case details for

Weissman v. Weissman

Case Details

Full title:DAVID J. WEISSMAN, Appellant, v. ANNE H. WEISSMAN, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 1, 2003

Citations

99 N.Y.2d 638 (N.Y. 2003)
790 N.E.2d 264

Citing Cases

Sprole v. Sprole

Under these circumstances, where the QDRO pertaining to the 401(k) account merely implemented the parties'…