Opinion
March 8, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants' claim that the respondent improperly failed to name the adjoining property owners as parties to this action is without merit, inasmuch as the interests of the other two landowners would not be affected by a judgment declaring the respondent's rights as to Library Avenue Extension and enjoining the appellants from interfering with that use (see, Cannon v. Sikora, 142 A.D.2d 662). Moreover, the record supports the Referee's determination as to the respondent's easement (see, Cashman v. Shutter, 226 A.D.2d 961; Heim v. Conroy, 211 A.D.2d 868).
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
Mangano, J. P., Ritter, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.