Summary
vacating panel opinion and granting rehearing en banc
Summary of this case from Weissman v. National Ass'nOpinion
No. 04-13575.
February 16, 2007.
Douglas R. Cox, Michael James Edney, Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, David Scott Mandel, Mandel Mandel, LLP, Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellants.
Steven I. Weissman, Hollywood, FL, pro se, and David Allen Freedman, Burlington, Weil, Schwiep, Kaplan, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 03-61107-CV-WJZ); William J. Zloch, Chief Judge.
(Opinion Nov. 1, 2006, 468 F.3d 1306, 11th Cir.2006)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.