From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weiss v. Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1980
76 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

June 9, 1980


In a matrimonial action in which a divorce was granted, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 19, 1979, as denied his application, inter alia, to enjoin the plaintiff from removing their son from New York State. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and defendant's application to restrain the plaintiff from removing the said minor son of the parties from the State of New York or in such manner as to deprive defendant of his visitation rights as provided for in the judgment of divorce herein is granted. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a separation agreement which was subsequently incorporated into but was not merged into the judgment of divorce. The agreement granted custody of the child to the plaintiff subject to liberal visitation rights of the defendant. A hearing was held wherein plaintiff stated that she was taking the child to Las Vegas, Nevada, to seek employment for herself. There was no proof submitted to support plaintiff's contention that she had a job there, only an allegation that there were better opportunities for employment in Las Vegas. Plaintiff also alleged that she presently lives in an area where mostly married couples reside. She complained that this factor was not very conducive to her social life. The contemplated move to Las Vegas would interfere with the defendant's visitation rights with his son, which rights he took advantage of. Plaintiff has not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances as would warrant the removal of the child to Las Vegas. Such move would result in a suspension of defendant's rights of visitation under the separation agreement. It is our determination, under the circumstances of this case, that should plaintiff fail to abide by the directive not to so remove the child, the defendant shall be relieved of his obligation to pay alimony and child support (cf. Walsh v. Walsh, 64 A.D.2d 980; Strahl v. Strahl, 66 A.D.2d 571, affd 49 N.Y.2d 1036; Domestic Relations Law, § 241). Gibbons, J.P., Gulotta, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weiss v. Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1980
76 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Weiss v. Weiss

Case Details

Full title:ROSALYN WEISS, Respondent, v. GEORGE D. WEISS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1980

Citations

76 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Vasiljev-Krusenstern

This may be due to the relative infrequency with which the fact pattern in the instant case is encountered —…

Priebe v. Priebe

Notwithstanding the formal placing of custody with the mother, the evidence is that the father has borne a…