Weiss v. Thomas Thomas Dev. Co.

2 Citing cases

  1. David v. Oxy USA, Inc.

    822 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Kan. 2011)   Cited 5 times
    Declining to impose a permanent injunction because "plaintiffs have failed to show that money damages would not be sufficient to compensate any potential future injury" resulting from the defendants' termination of free gas to the plaintiffs

    Such risks and expenses presumably include the dangers of using natural gas within a home for heat or to run appliances and the costs of purchasing equipment necessary to harness the natural gas for domestic purposes. But cf. Weiss v. Thomas & Thomas Dev. Co., 79 Ohio St.3d 274, 680 N.E.2d 1239, 1242–43 (1997) (holding the lessee, in providing free gas to the lessor, owed the lessor the same duty of care as a regulated public utility would owe its customers, despite express lease language placing the risk of using the gas on the lessor). Interpretation of the clause in this manner is consistent with and gives further meaning to the “for stoves and inside lighting” provision.

  2. Wood v. Mak Inv. Props.

    2024 Ohio 4485 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)

    Weiss v. Thomas & Thomas Dev. Co., 79 Ohio St.3d 274, 278 (1997).