From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisman v. Nunez

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Apr 21, 2021
316 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D21-244

04-21-2021

Stacie WEISMAN, Appellant, v. Dalba G. NUNEZ, Appellee.

Leonard S. Feuer of Leonard Feuer, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Murray Hudson of Murray Hudson, LLC, Boca Raton, for appellee.


Leonard S. Feuer of Leonard Feuer, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Murray Hudson of Murray Hudson, LLC, Boca Raton, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that "[w]ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory," and "[w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal").

Ciklin, Gerber and Forst, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weisman v. Nunez

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Apr 21, 2021
316 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Weisman v. Nunez

Case Details

Full title:STACIE WEISMAN, Appellant, v. DALBA G. NUNEZ, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 21, 2021

Citations

316 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)