From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisent v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 15, 1968
22 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Submitted April 15, 1968

Decided May 15, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JACOB J. SCHWARTZWALD, J.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel, for appellant.

Weinstein, Chayt Bard for respondent.


Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the ground that appellant, having been partially successful in the Appellate Division, may not appeal to this court as a matter of right upon a stipulation for judgment absolute pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd. [c]). ( Langer v. Amalgamated Mut. Auto. Cas. Co., 9 N.Y.2d 787; Fiscella v. Nassau Term. Bowling Alleys, 3 N.Y.2d 794; Anchin, Block Anchin v. Pennsylvania Coal Coke Corp., 308 N.Y. 985.)


Summaries of

Weisent v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 15, 1968
22 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

Weisent v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. WEISENT, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 15, 1968

Citations

22 N.Y.2d 670 (N.Y. 1968)
291 N.Y.S.2d 364
238 N.E.2d 753

Citing Cases

Roth v. Hudson Transit Lines

Similarly, the complaint or bill of particulars must allege precipitation or activation of a latent…

Huerta v. New York City Transit Authority

Decided May 2, 2002. Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court sua sponte, upon the ground that CPLR…