From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weirfield Hold. v. Pless Seeman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 15, 1931
257 N.Y. 536 (N.Y. 1931)

Opinion

Argued June 14, 1931

Decided July 15, 1931

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

William Gold and George Goldberg for appellant.

Eugene J. Noyes for Vandophal Holding Corporation, respondent.


Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term reversed and judgment ordered in favor of plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint, with costs in all courts, on authority of Graf v. Hope Bldg. Corp. ( 254 N.Y. 1); no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ.


Summaries of

Weirfield Hold. v. Pless Seeman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 15, 1931
257 N.Y. 536 (N.Y. 1931)
Case details for

Weirfield Hold. v. Pless Seeman

Case Details

Full title:WEIRFIELD HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. PLESS SEEMAN, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 15, 1931

Citations

257 N.Y. 536 (N.Y. 1931)
178 N.E. 784

Citing Cases

Gottlieb v. Gottlieb

As a result, the Court defined unconscionability in these terms: "over the years, an unconscionable bargain…

WBXB, LLC v. Rosswaag

Defense counsel argues that the purchase option is unenforceable for several reasons. Defendants first…