From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weintraub v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Aug 3, 2021
21 Civ. 4491 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 4491 (LGS)

08-03-2021

ALAN MARK WEINTRAUB, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain claims from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint on August 2, 2021. If the motion is granted, the scope of discovery in the case will be significantly narrowed.

WHEREAS, a court can stay discovery sua sponte. See Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83, 96 (2d Cir. 2012) (“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” (alteration in original) (quoting Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936))); Graduation Sols., LLC v Acadima, LLC, No. 17 Civ. 1342, 2018 WL 10398566, at *1 (D. Conn. June 21, 2018) (“A court has authority to, sua sponte, stay discovery and limit the scope pursuant to Rule 26(b)(2)(C).”). It is hereby

ORDERED that, in light of the motion to dismiss, (i) discovery is STAYED on all claims other than the Amended Complaint's Count III and (ii) all conferences are CANCELED.


Summaries of

Weintraub v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Aug 3, 2021
21 Civ. 4491 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Weintraub v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:ALAN MARK WEINTRAUB, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Aug 3, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 4491 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2021)