From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weintraub v. Half Hollow Central School Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1981
82 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

June 1, 1981


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), dated January 31, 1980, which granted the defendant school district's motion to dismiss the action as to it for failure to prosecute, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated March 24, 1980, as, upon reargument, adhered to the prior determination. Appeal from order dated January 31, 1980 dismissed. Said order was superseded by the order made upon reargument. Order dated March 24, 1980 reversed insofar as appealed from; order dated January 31, 1980 vacated, and the school district's motion denied. Plaintiffs are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Due to the serious nature of the infant plaintiff's injury and since a substantial portion of the delay in prosecution appears to have been caused by the defendants, this action should not be dismissed (Carron v De Granpre, 55 A.D.2d 712; Batista v St. Luke's Hosp., 46 A.D.2d 806). Damiani, J.P., Gibbons, Cohalan and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weintraub v. Half Hollow Central School Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1981
82 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Weintraub v. Half Hollow Central School Dist

Case Details

Full title:DIANE WEINTRAUB, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, HARRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1981

Citations

82 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Inner City Redev. Corp. v. Thyssen. Elevat. Corp.

An application for leave to renew must be predicated on new matters not available prior to the court's…

DABROWSKI v. ABAX INCORPORATED

The new facts relied upon on a motion to renew must lead the court to change its prior determination.…