From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WEINTRAUB v. COMPUTER RAD, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is granted.

Although the failure to timely restore an action to the trial calendar creates a presumption of abandonment (see, CPLR 3404), under the facts of this case, we find that the plaintiff made a sufficient showing to rebut the presumption (see, Fiorello v South Shore Dental Assocs., 203 A.D.2d 323; Roberson v. City of New York, 195 A.D.2d 597, 598). Accordingly, and because the plaintiff provided a sufficient affidavit of merit, we exercise our discretion and grant the application to restore this action to the trial calendar. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

WEINTRAUB v. COMPUTER RAD, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

WEINTRAUB v. COMPUTER RAD, INC

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL I. WEINTRAUB, P.C., Appellant, v. COMPUTER RAD, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 405 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

McCarthy v. Bagner

The plaintiff failed to appear for trial (see, Lee v. Chion, 213 A.D.2d 602). Furthermore, in light of the…

Cruz v. Volkswagen of America

The plaintiff's claim that he was unaware of a trial conference amounts to law office failure, which, under…